Cabvision TaxiPoint GIF.gif

“Conflict of interest and flawed reasoning” Judicial Review application against Westminster Magistrates to be heard today

13 Feb 2019

 

Today the London taxi trade will find out whether a request for a Judicial Review against Westminster Magistrates was successful.

The review is asking the courts whether the decision to grant a licence to Uber was done so on the basis of a conflict of interest and flawed reasoning.

The hearing will be heard before the Lord Chief Justice and Mr Justice Supperstone at 10.30am today.

Taxi organisation United Cabbies Group (UCG) instructed a senior commercial QC to provide a legal opinion on taking legal action against Transport for London, Westminster Magistrates Court and Uber along with support from a “key group of trade suppliers”.

The UCG along with supporters are called the United Trade Action Group (UTAG) and have been seeking funding for the action since Autumn 2018.

The UTAG have asked for drivers to support action for the right earned by completing the Knowledge of London, abiding by strict regulations enforced by TfL and being forced to drive a prescribed purpose-built vehicle which is both Wheelchair Accessible and subject to very rigorous Conditions of Fitness.

“This is an unprecedented legal challenge against Uber, Transport for London and Westminster Magistrates Court. It will shock many how Uber operate and are allowed to operate under the watchful blindness of the regulatory body there to protect” said Robert Griffiths QC and Barrister Stuart Jessop of 6 Pump Court, Temple.
 
Today marks the first legal step for the group as they look to bring action:
 

  • Against Westminster Magistrates and Judicially Review the decision to grant a license to Uber on the basis of conflict of interest and flawed reasoning.

  • Against Transport for London under multiple causes of action including its failure to regulate the statutory regime.

  • Against Uber under multiple causes of action including economic torts and the interference of your exclusive right to ply for hire.

 

 UTAG rely only on donations made via a crowdfunder to proceed with all legal action. Find out more here to support the action.

 
In a statement made the UCG late last year they added: “It has long been known by members of the trade that Uber operates a model which is identical to hailing and therefore infringes London taxi drivers’ exclusive right to ply for hire. This action will seek to address that injustice. 
 
“In this action we will forcefully pursue the argument that TfL knew or ought to have known that Uber is not and has never been a fit and proper person to hold an Operators’ Licence.

“One of the many reasons why it will be argued that Uber is not a fit and proper person includes issues relating to its corporate structure and fiscal operations.
 
“This is a concerted, comprehensive and unprecedented action against key parties including the regulatory body (TfL) and will seek to bring each and all parties to account for their part in the damage caused to our 360-year-old trade.

“Other similar actions are exclusively seeking damages, but this action will seek more than damages for any previous loss. It will seek to protect our exclusive right to ply for hire and ensure that PHV drivers and London Taxi drivers compete fairly.

“It will seek to protect the trade from current and further threats to its exclusive right to ply for hire and ensure that the distinct Two-Tier System is restored and not eroded.”

“We will seek to protect and preserve your exclusive right to ply for hire from current and future threats, the two-tier system has to be restored” added Darren Rogers from Chiltern Law. 

Please reload

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube Social  Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Facebook TaxiPoint
  • Twitter TaxiPoint
  • YouTube TaxiPoint
  • Instagram

Featured Stories

Please reload

ltda banner.JPG
Banner_720x200[10682].png
TaxiPoint--300x200px-MLP-GIF.gif
TaxiPoint_300x200_Dec19.gif
advert gif.GIF
ltpr.GIF
mymoneycomparison.gif
RSS Feed

The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the publishers.

 

All written and image rights are reserved by authors displayed. Creative Common image licenses displayed where applicable.

Reproduction in whole or in part without prior permission from the publisher is strictly prohibited.

All written content Copyright of TaxiPoint 2020.