Cabvision TaxiPoint GIF.gif

Morals and ethics: The tangled web of investment and business practice within the taxi industry

29 Apr 2019

There has been much debate over the last few years in relation to morality or business ethics within the taxi industry. 

 

On one side you have a group of individuals attempting to dictate what should be best practice within the industry, based on their own beliefs or moral judgement, while on the other side of the fence you have people within the industry baulking against those individuals, preferring to tread their own path, based on what they believe is best business practice for them as a sole trader.

Right and wrong doesn't actually come into the equation. Any sole trader, in theory at least, does what is best for them, and them alone, to allow them to survive and flourish, another persons business practice may not be conducive to any other individual.

 

According to the Department for Transport there are 57,900 licensed taxi drivers, 223,300 private hire drivers and 80,300 dual licence holders in the UK.

 

What seems to get forgotten within the taxi industry that although in any given region taxi drivers are competing against private hire drivers, they are also competing against each other.

 

The commonalities that bind the taxi trade together is the over-arching legislation pertaining to every aspect of the taxi industry, the vocational qualification (in some regions) obtained to allow an individual the opportunity to work as a taxi driver, the need to make driving a taxi economically viable entity, and finally the unequivocal requirement to make sure that the industry itself survives, so as to allow both current and future incumbents of the taxi industry are able to make some sort of living from the industry.

 

This of course must be extrapolated across the globe. The business model is relatively similar across the planet, there are very few deviations worldwide, therefore the problems faced by the industry are similar across the planet.

 

Over the last half decade or so, we have seen the birth, expansion, and domination of app-based companies within the private hire industry such as Uber, Lyft and Taxify to name but three. The taxi industry of course has its own apps, with Gett, mytaxi and Taxiapp being the main players in London, although both countywide and worldwide there are many others which are linked to the taxi industry.

 

The one thing all of these apps have in common is financial investment, whether it be from a number of global corporations, or investment through driver subscription. Without financial investment these companies would not be able to function successfully.

 

Rightly or wrongly, technology has started to over-ride what are seen as traditional working values, but then in almost every industry that you can think of this has been the case, and certainly with legislation being the slow, ponderous beast that it is, invariably it will always fail to keep up with technology, which seemingly changes on a daily basis.

 

With ever increasing regularity from the taxi industry across the UK, we see people shouting from the roof-tops, ditch this app because it's unethical and have taken corporate investment or boycott this credit card system because their parent company has invested in Uber. The list of what the industry should ditch, because one group or another may not agree with, on any given basis reads like a copy of War and Peace. In fact some would seemingly have the taxi industry wind the clock back and return to driving a horse and carriage through the streets, although ironically enough, in London, you would probably never notice any diffence in journey-time given the average speed of traffic across the capital.

 

Unfortunately, whether those within the taxi industry like it or not, almost every aspect of our lives are touched by behemoths such as Uber, directly, or indirectly, either via investment or via the use of a technological or media product. Whether it be the taxi you drive to the choice of filling station that you use, all are inextricably linked to companies which are seen as utterly toxic to the taxi industry.

 

Here are a number of varying examples in relation to those links both within the industry as well as everyday life.

 

Geely own LEVC, they also own Volvo, Volvo have agreed to supply 24,000 self-driving cars to Uber. Geely supply the TXE to the London taxi industry.

 

Daimler own Mercedes-Benz, they have also been part of a group which has invested $175m in Taxify. Mercedes supply the Vito to the London taxi industry, they are also investors in mytaxi.

 

CityFleet are a subsidiary of Comfort Delgro, they operate Computer Cab in London as well as other cities across the UK. In January 2018 Comfort Delgro launched a tie-up with Uber in Singapore called UberFlash.

 

Paypal are the owners of iZettle, they have just invested $500m in Uber. The PayPal and iZettle system are two of the credit card systems that have been approved by Transport for London to be fitted as fixed systems into the rear of taxis in London. Both PayPal and iZettle are used by many from within the taxi industry across the UK, while in London, Taxiapp has direct links with PayPal in relation to the system that they provide in conjunction with their payment solutions.

 

VW invested $300 million in Gett, they have now launched their own ride-sharing app in Rwanda called Move

 

Esso, partnered with Tesco, in turn Tesco partnered with Uber via their clubcard system, although this ends in July 2019. Esso are a company used by the taxi industry. 

 

Toyota are major investors in Uber technologies.

 

If you support Manchester United or Chelsea, they are or have been linked with Uber.

 

If you have Sky television or read any News international publication, Rupert Murdoch owns a minority stake in Uber.

 

Premier League Football, Sky and BT sport are part of a £4.46bn deal for the rights to show 160 games this season, again, linked to Murdoch and therefore linked to Uber.

 

Troy Carter at Spotify, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Airbnb co-founder Brian Chesky, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, are all Uber investors. It is highly likely that we've all used someof the products or services attached to any of these companies at some point.

 

Another couple of other companies linked to Uber in some way, either via media representation or in some other format such as UberEats include McDonalds and Anheuser-Busch, a company whos brands include Budweiser, Stella Artois and Becks. No doubt most of us have all succumbed to the need for a Big Mac every now and again, or fancied a Budweiser whilst watching Manchester United on Sky Sports. 

 

In short, the tentacles of any corporate behemoth reach further than the value of our work ethics as sole-traders, so where does that leave us as sole-traders and ultimately businessmen and women.

 

Everybody works differently, everybody has their own values, their own moral compass and their own business-nous. Unilateral agreement on working practices within the industry are almost impossible to impose because one persons meat is another persons poison, no matter how loud somebody shouts nothing will change that.

 

Remixed image: giusy64

Please reload

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube Social  Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • Facebook TaxiPoint
  • Twitter TaxiPoint
  • YouTube TaxiPoint
  • Instagram

Featured Stories

Please reload

ltda banner.JPG
black.gif
advert gif.GIF
TaxiPoint--300x200px-MLP-GIF.gif
advert gif.GIF
advert gif.GIF
RSS Feed

The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the publishers.

 

All written and image rights are reserved by authors displayed.

Reproduction in whole or in part without prior permission from the publisher is strictly prohibited.

All written content Copyright of TaxiPoint 2019. Creative Common image licenses displayed where applicable.