top of page
CMTbannerV2.gif

TAXI BILKING: Navigating the civil and criminal legalities around non-paying customers


The issue of passengers refusing to pay taxi fares presents a complex legal and procedural challenge, with implications for both taxi drivers and law enforcement. Despite the absence of specific policy or guidance dedicated solely to investigating fare disputes, the General Investigation Policy encompasses the relevant offences under existing legislation.


These incidents, often distressing for taxi drivers, fall under two primary legal categories: making off without payment, as defined by Section 3 of the Theft Act 1978, and obtaining services dishonestly, outlined in Section 11 of the Fraud Act 2006.

The former offence is typically committed when a passenger flees without settling the fare, a straightforward act of theft that leaves drivers both frustrated and financially disadvantaged. The latter, more nuanced, involves passengers who embark on journeys knowing they lack the means to pay, only revealing this incapacity upon reaching their destination or outright refusing to pay. These acts not only reflect dishonesty but also a premeditated intention to defraud taxi operators.


In response to these challenges, law enforcement agencies do provide training to telephone operators, emphasising the importance of recognising and appropriately responding to incidents of 'bilking'—the term used within the industry to describe making off without paying for taxi services.


With thousands of licensed taxi drivers across England, the sector is a vital component to any regional transport network and are usually subject to strict regulatory oversight. When fare disputes arise, the distinction between civil disputes and theft becomes paramount.

Civil disputes typically involve disagreements over the fare amount, route taken, or quality of service, necessitating a resolution that might involve the exchange of details and seeking civil remedies. Conversely, instances where passengers vomit in a cab or provide false information to avoid payment escalate the situation beyond a mere civil dispute, introducing potential criminal implications.

Comments


Subscribe to our newsletter. Receive all the latest news

Thanks for subscribing!

thumbnail_phonto (1).jpg
bottom of page