‘We can’t stand in the face of innovation’: Deputy Prime Minister’s robo-taxi stance does little to quell driver fears
- Perry Richardson

- 36 minutes ago
- 2 min read

The UK Government has signalled it will not stand in the way of autonomous vehicle technology, despite growing concerns about the impact self-driving taxis and private hire vehicles could have on hundreds of thousands of professional drivers.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy indicated that innovation in artificial intelligence and autonomous transport would continue to advance, even as questions remain about the future of employment within the taxi and private hire sector.
The comments came after Independent MP Ayoub Khan raised concerns about reports of robotic minicabs being deployed in London and potentially expanding across the country. Khan warned that around 400,000 private hire and black cab drivers could face an uncertain future as autonomous vehicle technology develops.
Responding to those concerns, Lammy stressed that safety and regulation would remain central to any rollout of autonomous vehicles. He told MPs: “We have to get the governance right, and of course we have to test and re-test to ensure safety. Anything on our roads would of course be tested and licensed by the Department for Transport.”
However, it was his closing remarks that may attract the greatest attention from drivers and operators across the industry.
“I do not think we can stand in the face of innovation,” Lammy said.
The statement represents one of the clearest indications yet that ministers view autonomous vehicle technology as an opportunity that should be embraced rather than resisted. While the Government continues to emphasise regulatory safeguards, there appears to be little appetite for restricting technological development because of concerns about potential job displacement.
For many within the taxi and private hire trade, the comments are likely to fuel concerns that autonomous passenger vehicles are moving from a future possibility towards a transport policy reality.
The debate comes as major technology companies, vehicle manufacturers and ride-hailing operators continue investing heavily in autonomous driving systems. Supporters argue the technology could improve road safety, reduce operating costs and expand transport services. Critics, however, point to the possible consequences for professional drivers whose livelihoods depend on transporting passengers.
Khan highlighted those concerns directly in Parliament, stating that drivers already face “unsafe working conditions, discrimination and low pay” and warning they could become “casualties of this AI drive”.
While no nationwide deployment of autonomous taxis has yet been announced, Lammy’s comments suggest the Government’s position is unlikely to be one of resistance. Instead, ministers appear focused on ensuring that when autonomous vehicles arrive on UK roads, they do so within a framework of testing, regulation and licensing rather than attempting to halt the technology’s development altogether.
For the taxi industry, the challenge may now be less about whether autonomous vehicles are coming, and more about how quickly they arrive and what role human drivers will continue to play alongside them.







